Ahead in B2B software

Be the shortlist, not the alternative.

Software buying now starts inside an AI answer. Best tool for X, X versus Y, alternatives to X — the three query shapes answer engines handle best, and the three most SaaS marketing sites refuse to address honestly.

  • Free, no account
  • 25 queries, not one
  • Results in ~90 seconds
ChatGPTIllustrative

What is the best helpdesk software for a 20-person team?

For a team that size the usual recommendations are Intercom if you want messaging-first support, Help Scout for a simpler shared inbox, and Zendesk once you need heavier reporting and routing. Your brand — not mentioned Most comparisons put the decision on whether you need a full ticketing workflow or just a well-organised inbox.

Sourcesg2.comcapterra.comreddit.comtrustradius.com

Type it to see where you sit in this answer.

What we measure

The five questions your buyers ask.

Every scan generates one prompt from each cluster, shaped by what you actually sell. These are the shapes they take in saas.

  • Discoverybest helpdesk software for a small team
  • ComparisonIntercom vs Zendesk for startups
  • Validationis Notion worth it for project management
  • Shortlistbest project management tools 2026
  • AttributeCRM tools with a genuinely free tier

What you actually get

Not a score. A list of what to do.

See the gap, not just the number.

The same twenty-five queries are scored for you and for three competitors detected from your own site. A citation rate on its own is abstract. The distance between you and the brand winning your category is not.

Competitor gap · 25 queriesIllustrative
  • Intercom19/25
  • Help Scout14/25
  • Zendesk9/25
  • You1/25

Know exactly where to show up.

Every domain the engine read to build its answer, ranked by how often it appeared. In saas that set is small and stable, which makes it a target list rather than a research project.

Cited instead of youIllustrative
  • 01g2.com9×
  • 02capterra.com7×
  • 03reddit.com5×
  • 04trustradius.com4×

These are the pages the engine read to build its answer. Appearing on them is the work.

Six engines, one prompt set.

The free check runs one engine. The full report runs all six on identical prompts, so you can see which engines already recommend you and which have never heard of you — they disagree more than most people expect.

All six engines · full reportIllustrative
  • ChatGPT4/25
  • Claude11/25
  • Gemini2/25
  • Perplexity7/25
  • Copilot1/25
  • Grok3/25

What we change

Four things, in this order.

01

An alternatives and comparison surface that actually competes

Your competitors already rank for 'alternatives to you'. If you have no honest comparison content, the engine builds its answer from their framing of you. We write the comparison pages properly — including where a competitor is the better fit, which is what makes the page credible enough to be cited.

02

Documentation restructured as extractable answers

Docs are usually the largest, most factual, least optimised asset a SaaS company owns. Restructured so each page answers one question completely and self-containedly, they become the most citable thing on the domain.

03

Review platform and directory signals

Answer engines lean heavily on G2, Capterra, and category directories for B2B software, because those sources are structured and independent. Thin or stale profiles there cost citations no amount of on-site work recovers.

04

SoftwareApplication and Organization entity work

Pricing tiers, supported platforms, integrations, and category all need to be machine-readable. This is what lets an engine answer a constrained question — 'under $50 a month', 'with a Slack integration' — with your product in the set.

Four phases, thirty days.

  1. 01BaselineTwenty prompts across six answer engines, five runs each, for you and three competitors. Every raw response is stored. You get a citation rate and a competitor gap that can be re-run and checked rather than taken on trust.
  2. 02DiagnosisWe map every citation back to its source and separate the three causes: entity signals the engine cannot resolve, comparison questions nothing on your site answers, and third-party domains where you are absent and your competitors are not.
  3. 03ExecutionStructured data and entity fixes shipped, the comparison and shortlist pages written, and outreach aimed at the specific domains the baseline showed being cited instead of you. Prioritised by what the data says will move first.
  4. 04Re-scanThe identical prompt set re-run at day thirty against the stored baseline. Before and after on the same queries, on the same engines, with the raw responses from both runs kept as evidence.

What you get.

  • Baseline report: 20 prompts × 6 engines, you and three competitors
  • Entity and structured data specification, ready to implement
  • Comparison and shortlist content plan, page by page
  • Ranked target list of the source domains cited instead of you
  • Day-30 re-scan on identical prompts, with the raw responses from both runs

Questions from saas teams.

Partly. Strong organic rankings mean your pages are crawlable and reasonably authoritative, which helps retrieval. It does not mean you are named in generated answers, because those are assembled from a handful of sources that make comparisons explicitly — a shape most SaaS sites never publish.

Start with the number.

Run the free check, then tell us what you need — your result is attached automatically.

  • Free, no account
  • 25 queries, not one
  • Results in ~90 seconds

Other industries